User talk:Topjabot

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Please post all comments to User talk:Gerrit.

Thank you.

I go the answer :-)

TimStarling: hi Anthere
britty: jour
Anthere: jour
Anthere: tim ?
Anthere: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special%3ARecentchanges
Anthere: this user is a bot
Anthere: but it is still appearing in rc
Anthere: why ?
TimStarling: hang on
TimStarling: I think it's because uploads are not hidden, regardless of the bot flag
TimStarling: I'm surprised no-one has fixed that yet, people have been complaining about it for a long time
Anthere: ahhh

You got it !

Anthere 04:55, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Tags[edit]

Hi. Nice bot. I think that should run on all wikis to copy PD and GFDL images. However, some of the copied images were missing the license tags. E.g. Image:Swiss National Park, 1.jpg, Image:Swiss National Park, 2.jpg, Image:Swiss National Park, 3.jpg, or Image:Flag North-Holland, Netherlands.png. Could you make sure that there is always a tag? Thanks -- Chris 73 15:05, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Ah, I will. Sorry for the problem. About the copying of all images: I think this should be done server-side, because it would spare a lot of bandwidth. For now, I only do it for images on one language wiki I need on another. Gerrit 12:40, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC) (a.k.a. Topjaklont, owner of Topjabot)
No problem. If it's done server side, then they may even be able to include the history of the image, including who uploaded it. Now that would be cool! -- Chris 73 14:09, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)

I fixed the user links, see [1] for example. I think it´s very odd that you don´t paste the history of images, because the original images on de.wikipedia (in this case) are deleted because they are already on the commons. If you don´t note the author with a link like from [[:de:Benutzer:Tobo|Tobo]] there´s a totally wrong information because Topjabot is not the author (which is not in accord with the GNU-FDL)! Please think about this as Chris 73 also pointed out above. Thanks a lot --:Bdk: 07:43, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Image:Athyrium filix-femina0.jpg[edit]

Hi Topjabot - this one Image:Athyrium filix-femina0.jpg is mis-identified; it is Asplenium trichomanes subsp. quadrivalens. I'll annotate the photo, but it should be moved to the correct name too - MPF 22:10, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)

fixed, image is now stored as Image:Asplenium trichomanes subsp quadrivalens.jpg --:Bdk: 07:19, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Wrong aligned Images[edit]

Some of the pictures uploaded by this Bot are view rotated 90° see Verbascum olympicum. --Donny 13:22, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Its not only "some" ... there are many images which need rotation and it´s a f****** (sorry) work to fix it. I´ve rotated around 30 or more pictures up to now :-( --:Bdk: 07:12, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
A comment of Kurt Stüber in the picturelibrary:"This image collection is still somewhat under construction, so please forgive, when some of the images still have to be rotated by 90 degrees or when some of the family names are missing or not unique (Compositae and Asteraceae both occur for instance)."--Soebe 09:51, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
I have rotated over 50% of the collection of rotated photos and should be finished this week. WayneRay 17:12, 14 June 2006 (UTC)WayneRayReply[reply]

Correcting image names[edit]

Hi, just letting you know that these images have been moved to correct their wrong name:

Thanks, pfctdayelise (translate?) 12:01, 23 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:Montrichardia linifera0.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Montrichardia linifera0.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  català  čeština  dansk  eesti  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  français  español  Esperanto  English  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  조선말  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  +/−

This is an automated message from BryanBot. 14:35, 16 February 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Image:Petrorhagia_saxifraga2.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Petrorhagia_saxifraga2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  català  čeština  dansk  eesti  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  français  español  Esperanto  English  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  조선말  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  +/−

Chrumps 23:14, 25 July 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Malvaviscus_arboreus3.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Malvaviscus_arboreus3.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. ALE! ¿…? 09:04, 13 November 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Rosa_sp.164.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Rosa_sp.164.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. abf /talk to me/ 17:54, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Gleditsia_sinensis1.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Gleditsia_sinensis1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 08:36, 11 March 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Topjabot!
Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 03:48, 8 September 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File tagging File:Ricinus_communis1.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ricinus_communis1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ricinus_communis1.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Kelly (talk) 23:47, 1 January 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Montrichardia_linifera[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Montrichardia_linifera has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 14:22, 3 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Veronica_austriaca_austriaca[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Veronica_austriaca_austriaca has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RE rillke questions? 14:14, 6 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oenothera_tetragona_fraseri[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Oenothera_tetragona_fraseri has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RE rillke questions? 14:16, 6 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ludwigia_lemnithoechiza[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Ludwigia_lemnithoechiza has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RE rillke questions? 14:17, 6 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ruscus aculeatus[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Ruscus aculeatus has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- Tuválkin 08:33, 13 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ruscus aculeatus[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Ruscus aculeatus has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- Tuválkin 22:30, 20 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Illustration Morus nigra0.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Illustration Morus nigra0.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2001:8A0:F323:C401:406F:8F12:DE7:21E8 17:52, 16 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Lomandra filiformis1.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Lomandra filiformis1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

52.64.219.10 02:31, 10 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Galvezia speciosa[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Galvezia speciosa has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 04:23, 7 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Choisya ternata0.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Choisya ternata0.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Salix (talk) 19:12, 19 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]