User talk:Gampe

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Older threads you will find here: User talk:Gampe/Archive

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Praha kostel sv Jilji z Uh trhu.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint Giles in Prague, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

TUSC token: 88e828c1771dc16fad949afc1595b3bc[edit]

I am now proud owner of a WMFLabs TUSC account!--Gampe (talk) 07:34, 21 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
You are a very good uploader ! Thanks for your contribs ! Photographically - Yours Frze > talk 03:28, 5 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank You! --Gampe (talk) 03:44, 5 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kamenicka 35-1512.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kamenicka 35-1512.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:51, 22 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kamenicka 35-1515.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kamenicka 35-1515.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:56, 22 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

AIR House CTU 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! AIR House CTU 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:51, 4 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Letná palace 5953.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Letná palace 5953.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:03, 7 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Letná palace 5958.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Letná palace 5958.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:12, 7 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

New Fotograf[edit]

Hi Gampe, I have seen a new User:Radka.Novakova.9, with photos near Brno, but I think she need a little help, I don't now, if there speak more than cestina ;-) it's only information, and have a nice day, regards from the neighbourhood --K@rl (talk) 12:05, 23 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Okay, this one I don't see it ;-) --regards K@rl (talk) 13:17, 23 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Descriptions[edit]

Hi Gampe, now a new request: the photos from User:Martina Pařízková haven't a description. There are not many, but for the few, which I know, I added ingerman, parhaps you can add there in česky too. regards and děkuji --K@rl (talk) 14:37, 13 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi K@rl, all contributions of Martina Pařízková are from WLM 2013. Since then she had no editing. --Gampe (talk) 18:10, 13 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I know,but the photos havent a decription till now :-) - this was the request, that you can add this description - there are not so many photos.-regards K@rl (talk) 21:09, 13 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Done (I hope). Thanks! --Gampe (talk) 05:24, 14 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Josef Ullmann - Oráč (po r.1910).jpg[edit]

Prosím o kontrolu tohoto souboru: File:Josef Ullmann - Oráč (po r.1910).jpg po jeho načtení se tam ukazuje toto: Error in template * unknown parameter name (Template:Information): '1; 2'

patrně jsem něco udělal špatně, ale nemohu příjít na co jsem udělal špatně. Nerozumím tomu. Děkuji--Martin wolf (talk) 22:19, 26 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Problém byl v té složité internetové adrese, která obsahovala znaky, se kterými si šablona nevěděla rady. Zjednodušil jsem ji. Druhá věc, kterou jsem tam našel, byla kategorie, kde se míchali dva Josefové Ullmanové. Rozsadil jsem je a udělal rozcestník. Zdraví --Gampe (talk) 04:08, 27 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Děkuji za pomoc. S tím jsem si nevěděl rady. Toho malíře Josefa Ullmanna jsem založil na Wikipedii, ale adresa Josef Ullmann již byla obsazená, tak jsem musel založit Josef Ullmann (malíř). Na commons však někdo načetl jeho obrazy pod Josef Ullmann a tak jsem tam s tím kouzlil, abych to nějak sloučil. Ještě se v tom tolik nevyznám. Něco podobného se stalo u stránky Josef Král (malíř). Stránku jsem založil pod touto již připravenou adresou (na Wikipedii svítila červeně), ale na comons někdo načet jeho obrazy pod adresou Josef Jaroslav Král. Dal jsem to (ani nevím jak) do podkategorie. Josef Král (malíř) a Josef Jaroslav Král jsou jedna osoba. Díky za pomoc a zdravím--Martin wolf (talk) 07:37, 27 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:Ernestine Roessler.jpg[edit]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ernestine Roessler.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 02:15, 3 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Categories in slovak monuments[edit]

Ahoj Gampe, I need your help, because it looiks like, that an slovak user the User:Ľuboš Repta don't understand the sceme of the categories of monuments in slovakie. Each community need an own category:Cultural monuments in xy, because they are used in slovak and german articles and wikidata to upload files. But I think he understand wheter teh english explanation nor the sense of the system. This system is approx. teh austrian and works thince few years. Perhaps its possible, that you can explain him this. It's not necessarey, that he makes new categories, vbut he shgould not disturb the existing system. thank a lot --regards K@rl (talk) 16:24, 3 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Odborový dům Na Perštýně (7849).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Odborový dům Na Perštýně (7849).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There's a dustspot in the sky. --Tsungam 14:06, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
corrected --Gampe 16:04, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Good for me now. --Tsungam 16:24, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Odborový dům Na Perštýně (7849).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Odborový dům Na Perštýně.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Zdravím,

ano, ta fotka je naše a byla pořízena někým z rodiny. Vyšla v tisku mnohokrát.


:File:Myrtil Frída.JPG[edit]

přesunuto na diskusní sttánku User talk:Jiri.cieslar. --Gampe (talk) 06:23, 25 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

podivná změna při nahrávání obrázků[edit]

Změnil se nějak spůsob při vytváření kategorií nově nahraných obrázků? Chová se to jinak než jsem byl zvyklí. Postupuji tak jak jste mě napsal, ale hlásí to pořád, že je kategorie prázná i když jsem nahrál obrázek.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%C5%A0tefan_Onder%C4%8Do_%281884-1937%29.jpeg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:%C5%A0tefan_Onder%C4%8Do

Nevím jak bych lépe posal. Díky za odpověď.--Martin wolf (talk) 23:09, 20 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

U mě se to chová normálně, i na wikidatech je vše v pořádku. Ono to někdy chvilku trvá, než se všechny změny projeví. Zdraví --Gampe (talk) 03:36, 21 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Děkuji za odpověď. Máte pravdu, už je to v pořádku. Takto se to zachovalo poprvé, že se nic nezobrazilo asi deset minut a tak jsem znejistil. Načetl jsem další obrázeka a zase nic. Nechal jsem toho a raději se vás zeptal. Příště počkám. Hezký den --Martin wolf (talk) 07:57, 21 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Díky za zprávu, Mně to dnes zlobí podobným způsobem jako Vás, nahrál jsem ráno fotku a doteď se v kategorii neobjevuje. mějte se hezky. --Gampe (talk) 10:22, 21 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Slezská němčina - Audio[edit]

Cześć Gampe!

Pare miesięcy temu nagrałeś wymowę nazw miejscowości w dialekcie górnołużyckim (Oberlausitzer Mundart) np. Äberuderwitz.

Czy możesz zrobić coś takiego dla dialektu śląskiego (Slezská němčina) np.:

Slezská němčina (Schläsch) Čeština
Brassel Vratislav (město), (polsky: Wrocław)
Walmbrich Valbřich (polsky: Wałbrzych)
Herschbrich Jelení Hora (polsky: Jelenia Góra)
Lamrich (polsky: Lwówek Śląski, německy: Löwenberg in Schlesien)
Potschke Pačkov (polsky: Paczków , německy: Patschkau)
Strahla Střelín (polsky: Strzelin)
Striege Střihom (polsky: Strzegom)
Gruttke (pol. Grodków, něm. Grottkau)
Glootz Kladsko
Schweinz Svídnice (Polsko)
Uppeln Opolí
Aeberbeuthn (polsky: Bytom , německy: Beuthen in Oberschlesien)
Rattebor Ratiboř (Slezské vojvodství)
Bunzel Boleslav (polsky: Bolesławiec)
Zota (polsky: Sobótka)
Schläsche Sproache Slezská němčina
Schläsing Slezsko
Aeberschläsing Horní Slezsko
Niederschläsing Dolní Slezsko
Schläsinger Slezané

Można to zapisać np. jako Sli-Brassel.ogg, Sli-Schläsing.ogg itd. Będę serdecznie wdzięczny za pomoc. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.70.56.196 (talk) 12:18, 02 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Cześć, there is no problem, but one: we need to find a native speaker of Silesian German. Do you know someone like that? I will try to ask my Silesian friends. --Gampe (talk) 12:56, 2 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Dzięki za odpowiedz ogólne zasady wymowy tego dialektu śląskiego są takie same jak w języku niemiecku np. sch to polskie sz, tz to polskie c itd. Są też ciekawostki jak Ae czyta się to, jak polskie e (i zawsze Ae występuje na początku wyrazu np.: Aeberschläsing, Aeberbeuthn). Przykładowo: Bunzel czyta się po polsku jak Buncel, Brassel to po polsku wymawia się jak Brasel, zaś Schläsing czyta się jak po polsku Szlezing

W Google tłumacz jest funkcja słuchaj https://translate.google.pl/?hl=pl&tab=wT#de/pl/Brassel tam jest przybliżona wymowa tych wyrazów. Ogólne zasady wymowy są takie same jak w j. niemiekim tylko Ae czyta jak e. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.70.56.196 (talk) 16:32, 02 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nie umię zrobić to w ten sposób. Moje rekordy zostały wykonane w ten sposób: miejscowy ekspert powiedział: ten człowiek mówi naprawdę autentyczne miejscowego dialektu. Potem poprosiliśmy, że człowiek, aby zapoznać się z nazwy i nagrałem go. Nie umię pracować z tych narzędzi Google. --Gampe (talk) 04:15, 3 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Google tłumacz to był tylko taki przykład (nie sugeruj się tym). Jeśli naprawdę znalazłeś jakiegoś człowieka, który posługuję się tym dialektem i go nagrasz to cudownie. Podsumowując nagraj wymowę tych nazw miejscowości tak jak zrobiłeś to w dialekcie górnołużyckim (Oberlausitzer Mundart) np. Äberuderwitz. PS. Serdecznie dziękujem, że się tym zainteresowałeś. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.70.56.196 (talk) 08:31, 03 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Gampe nie zapomnij o tym projekcie wiele Ślązaków czeka na ten projekt Slezská němčina - Audio—Preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.207.118.77 (talk) 20. 6. 2016, 22:14‎ (UTC)
Cześć Gampe! Możesz te miejscowości nareszcie nagrać w audio. Dzięki temu uratujesz historię i kulturę tych ziem.

File:Kiefer AEIOU 2013-6.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Kiefer AEIOU 2013-6.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Alinea (talk) 19:47, 2 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Kiefer AEIOU 2013-6.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Kiefer AEIOU 2013-6.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Natuur12 (talk) 15:37, 5 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

LX (talk, contribs) 18:41, 22 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ok, delete it please, there is no usage tor it.--Gampe (talk) 06:44, 24 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No source / OTRS missing[edit]

Hi Gampe! Could you please check: File:01 Rozmberk Jakobinka beranidlo.jpg. I can't find an OTRS Ticket. Do you still have the ticket number? Thanks for your time! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:54, 21 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

And the other ones from Jitka Skořepová are without ticket as well. Please help! Thanks! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:14, 21 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Wiki02CinoFront1965.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Wiki02CinoFront1965.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan2 (talk) 21:53, 10 July 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Karlstejn (5711).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karlstejn (5711).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:34, 3 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Karlstejn (5651).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karlstejn (5651).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:52, 10 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 13 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Kampus Dejvice logo.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Kampus Dejvice logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 14:39, 16 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fotky z Kostel na dědině a v městečku[edit]

Ahoj Gampe, kde jsi sebral fotky z knihy Kostel na dědině a v městečku? Nikde to není digitalizováno. Dominikmatus (talk) 08:08, 18 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Digitalizuji sám, ale po kousíčkách. Co bys potřeboval?--Gampe (talk) 12:37, 18 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Chystám článek o kostelu v Tamovicích (Štramberk) a napsal jsem o kostelu v Rybí. Dominikmatus (talk) 09:53, 19 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Rybí ti naskenuju ale Tamovice v seznamu (viz odkaz výše) nevidím. nebo je to skryto pod nějakým jiným názvem? --Gampe (talk) 19:02, 20 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Aha, tak je to pod Závišicemi. Dominikmatus (talk) 20:33, 22 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Máš je tam:

File:Wiki Loves Monuments exhibition in ED Praha 7.jpg[edit]

Ahoj, mohl bys prosím do File:Wiki Loves Monuments exhibition in ED Praha 7.jpg doplnit interní odkazy na vyobrazená díla? Podle mého soudu nejde úplně o COM:De minimis, takže je to nejspíš nutné. A zvaž to raději i u File:Wiki Loves Monuments exhibition in ED Praha 2.jpg a File:Wiki Loves Monuments exhibition in ED Praha 4.jpg. Díky moc. S pozdravem --Mates (talk) 14:55, 5 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Jasně, je to tam. --Gampe (talk) 15:06, 5 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Schöne Weihnachten[edit]

Ahoj, ich wünsche dir schöne Feiertage und ein gutes neues Jahr. --lg aus Wien K@rl (talk) 21:44, 22 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Commons Barnstar[edit]

Commons barnstar.png The Commons Barnstar
Hi Gampe! I've been away for a while from Wikimedia projects, including OTRS. Since I came back, one of the first things I noticed was your activity in different fields and projects. Please, let me award you with this barnstar for "particularly fine contributions to Commons". I consider you to be one of the most valuable contributors. You work offline a lot, you connect people and promote Wikimedia projects like Commons out there. That's something what is so needed! I believe we need to support more people like you. Thank you so much for your long lasting work, it's admirable. All the best, Podzemnik (talk) 23:22, 25 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank You! --Gampe (talk) 04:29, 26 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hakjosef[edit]

Ahoj, to je spíš na rychlé nebo hromadné smazání. Já jsem na rychlé smazání označil ty tři obrazy od Maxe Švabinského a Hakjosefa upozornil dvakrát na české Wikipedii (tam ho kdyžtak můžu zablokovat). Gumruch (talk) 15:00, 24 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Uvažoval jsem rovněž o "speedy", ale pak použil "deletion", co kdyby to svolení opravdu měl... to se už i stalo, že jsem ospídoval soubory skutečnému dědici a ten se pak naštval a přestal s wiki spolupracovat. --Gampe (talk) 15:04, 24 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hups, nevšiml jsem si téhle diskuse. Já to zrovna všechno smazal. Hakjosef uploaduje ty soubory páté přes deváte od různých autorů, podle mě je jen mizivá šance, že by to svolení měl. Vypadá to na fotky někdy z galerie. Napíšu mu. Pěkný den oběma, --Podzemnik (talk) 15:18, 24 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

The fortress church of St. Mary of Mercy in Vrboska (6729).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The fortress church of St. Mary of Mercy in Vrboska (6729).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Atamari 21:12, 29 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 2 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open![edit]

POTY barnstar.svg

Dear Gampe,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks![edit]

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at Wikimedia Commons.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

einschönes neues Jahr[edit]

Hallo Gampe, ich hoffe, dass du die Feiertage gut verbracht hast - ich wünsche dir ein schönes neues Jahr 2020. liebe grüße aus Wien K@rl (talk) 12:16, 28 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Madona z Těrlicka J5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Madona z Těrlicka J5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:17, 16 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Madona z Těrlicka J1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Madona z Těrlicka J1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:51, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Madona z Těrlicka C5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Madona z Těrlicka C5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:10, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Madona z Těrlicka C1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Madona z Těrlicka C1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:10, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Statue of Maria Theresa in Prague (7217).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Maria Theresa in Prague (7217).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Nefronus 19:55, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Statue of Maria Theresa in Prague (7213).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Maria Theresa in Prague (7213).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 09:29, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Statue of Maria Theresa in Prague (7237).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Maria Theresa in Prague (7237).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:28, 19 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Způsob zakládání kategorií[edit]

Ahoj, co se týče těch kategorií, díky, že sis toho všiml a Category:Tržní (Kaplice) založil. Většinou při větších uploadech k souborům dávám názvy kategorií různé (podle ulic). Pak si založím jejich přehled a doplňuji ty, které jsou červené. Příklad hotového přehledu je třeba tady. Vypadá to, že mi u Kaplice jedna unikla. Jen pro zajímavost :-) Aktron (talk) 13:12, 15 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Mně je to jasné, ale měřím všem stejným metrem. :-) --Gampe (talk) 13:37, 15 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File tagging File:Augustin Kovařík.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Augustin Kovařík.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

I think your edit is wrong because the picture has a definite author.SD hehua (talk) 11:28, 6 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Do you see any author's work in that file? Gampe (talk) 11:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Augustin Kovařík.jpg[edit]

Hallo Gampe, many thanks for your note on this picture, so I take a notice for this people and I wrote so an article regiowiki:Augustin Kovařík to have a connection to the czech article ;-) --regards -- K@rl (talk) Mid Abstond hoidn xund bleibn 19:18, 7 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Textilka 4 C.k. budova.jpg:[edit]

Ahoj, děkuji za opravu ĺicence u obrázku. User:Bohemianroots

Bohemianroots (talk) 11:16, 23 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Rádo se stalo. Gampe (talk) 11:43, 23 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ETR 480 008 BAC Pendolino (Eurostar)[edit]

Dobrý den, u jednoho ze souborů, který jsem nahrál na Wikimedia Commons a vy jste soubor ověřoval v OTRS chybí nálepka File:ETR 480 008 BAC Pendolino (Eurostar), Civitavecchia railway station 25. 8. 2000 (Italy).webm. Je to maličkost, ale někdo si může všimnout výstražného trojúhelníku namísto nálepky a může nastat zmatek. Čtenář si bude myslet, že soubor nebyl ověřen a do historie souboru se nepodívá. Nebo je problém se souborem? Hezký den. --Edwin Tangen (talk) 11:02, 15 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dobrý den, děkuji za upozornění, napravil jsem. Gampe (talk) 11:55, 15 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:Ollmütz COSK 1833.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Ollmütz COSK 1833.jpg

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ollmütz COSK 1833.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:06, 6 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]